Jump to content

Talk:John C. Lilly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John C. Lilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lol MKUltra to the core wake up sheeple — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.251.28 (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Lovatt and the dolphin thing

[edit]

I appreciate that it's a lucid detail of his life and its relevance to his work is minor. But to a lot of people, this is the guy who funded and hired a woman who masturbated a dolphin for science. To not mention this at all seems like deliberate whitewashing. 80.43.80.141 (talk) 14:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would we duplicate the material at Margaret Howe Lovatt? What she did or didn't do gets described in her article. It would be off-topic here. This is not a "whitewash", it's called "staying on topic". Skyerise (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well..... you could link the two articles; to not do so seems sneaky. 96.20.111.52 (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]